Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reject types that DeferredArray doesn't support #1044

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2023

Conversation

manopapad
Copy link
Contributor

IMHO there is little value in pretending that we support these types. We currently accept them by falling back to EagerArray, and that works for a little bit, but it is possible that later we will need to convert to a truly Legion-backed implementation, in which case the failure will pop up there.

Instead we should just reject them from the start.

IMHO there is little value in pretending that we support these types.
We currently accept them by falling back to EagerArray, and that
works for a little bit, but it is possible that later we will need to
convert to a truly Legion-backed implementation, in which case the
failure will pop up there.

Instead we should just reject them from the start.
@manopapad manopapad added the category:task PR is a simple task and will not be included in release notes label Sep 12, 2023
@manopapad manopapad requested a review from bryevdv September 12, 2023 20:36
@manopapad manopapad merged commit 892799f into nv-legate:branch-23.09 Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:task PR is a simple task and will not be included in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants